Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube

This time ChatGPT won: His poems surpassed Shakespeare

byadmin
November 17, 2024

A new study conducted in the US revealed that poems written by the artificial intelligence-supported language model ChatGPT were preferred by people without any expertise in the field of literature over works by poets such as William Shakespeare and Emily Dickinson.

While the role of artificial intelligence in art is becoming a topic of debate every day, a new study has revealed that some readers prefer the poems written by ChatGPT to those of the giants of literary history.
A study conducted by Brian Porter and Edouard Machery from the University of Pittsburgh in the USA showed that people who are not literary experts cannot distinguish whether the poems were written by humans or artificial intelligence. The research was published in the journal Scientific Reports on November 14.
ChatGPT 3.5 was asked to write poems in the style of poets such as Shakespeare, Dickinson, Lord Byron and T.S. Eliot. The researchers selected 10 of these poems and presented them to 1,634 participants. The participants tried to guess whether the poems were written by AI or by a human hand. The results revealed that the AI ​​poems were mostly perceived as written by a human hand. While it is often thought that the works of AI are created by humans, all of the 5 texts that are considered least likely to have been written by a human being belonged to a chatbot.
The researchers measured the aesthetic appreciation of poems with a different group. 696 participants rated the poems according to criteria such as quality, emotion, rhythm, and originality. Interestingly, the AI ​​poems were liked more. However, when the participants knew that the poems were written by AI, their evaluation scores dropped. However, the group assessed without any information preferred the AI ​​poems more than the humans.
According to Porter and Machery, the “average” approach used by the AI’s language models reduces the complexity and strangeness of unusual poems. This could make AI poems more understandable and appealing.
Dorothea Lasky, the only living poet included in the study, said she was not worried that AI would take her job, adding, “Poetry will always be necessary.” Lasky emphasized that the fact that AI poems were also loved by people was a positive development. On the other hand, some experts, such as Michele Elam from Stanford University, are more cautious about the impact of AI on art. Elam warned that AI products could change our relationship with art and limit the way we make sense of our realities.
byadmin
Published
Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

Read more